The “Oops!” Response
Why some people learn more from their mistakes. Read more in this guest article from Scientific American MIND.
Is intelligence innate, or can you boost it with effort? The way you answer that question may determine how well you learn. Those who think smarts are malleable are more likely to bounce back from their mistakes and make fewer errors in the future, according to a study published last October in Psychological Science.
Researchers at Michigan State University asked 25 undergraduate students to participate in a simple, repetitive computer task: they had to press a button whenever the letters that appeared on the screen conformed to a particular pattern. When they made a mistake, which happened about 9% of the time, the subjects realized it almost immediately – at which point their brain produced two tiny electrical responses that the researchers recorded using electrodes. The first reaction indicates awareness that a mistake was made, whereas the second, called error positivity, is believed to represent the desire to fix that slip-up. Later, the researchers asked the students whether they believed intelligence was fixed or could be learned.
Although everyone slowed down after erring, those who were “growth-minded” – that is, people who considered intelligence to be pliable – elicited stronger error-positivity responses than the other subjects. They subsequently made fewer mistakes, too. “Everybody says, ‘Oh, I did something wrong, I should slow down,’ but it was only the growth-minded individuals who actually did something with that information and made it better,” explains lead author Jason Moser, a clinical psychologist at Michigan State.
People who are not so inclined, however, can change their approach, Moser adds. “A growth mind-set is about focusing on the process – as in the experience – rather than only on the outcome,” he says. “Setbacks are opportunities to gain information and learn for the next time, so pay attention to what went wrong and get the information you need to improve.”
Â
Click to read more from Scientific American MINDÂ
Special offer for QDT readers: FREE Trial Issue
Reproduced with permission.  Copyright ©2013 Scientific American, a division of Nature America, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Oops!opens IMAGE file photo from Shutterstock.
